Research
I am currently a postdoctoral research scientist at Lowell Obsevatory working with Dave Schleicher. We obtain narrowband and broadband optical observations of comets, primarily using the Hall 42-inch telescope at Anderson Meas, Lowell Observatory's dark sky research site. We use imaging and photometry to characterize the composition, activity, and rotational state of the nuclei of various comets. Past and upcoming comets of interest include C/2007 N3 Lulin, 22P/Kopff, 81P/Wild 2, 107P/Wilson-Harrington, and 103P/Hartley 2.
103P/Hartley 2
|
Comet 103P/Hartley 2 is the target of NASA's EPOXI mission in November 2010. The 2010 apparition is its best since being discovered in 1986, as it passed within 0.12 AU of the Earth in late October. We observed it from August 13-17, primarily using broadband R and narrowband CN filters on the Hall 1.1-m telescope at Lowell Observatory. While we saw no activity other than a dust just in the R images, we saw a gas "jet" in the CN images. Image enhancement revealed that the morphology of the jet repeats in 16.6 +/- 0.5 hours. This agrees with the rotation period determined by imaging the nucleus when it was far from the Sun using a number of large telescopes (Meech et al. 2009). We obtained subsequent observations September 9-13 (Hall 1.1-m), Oct 12-14 (0.8-m robotic), and October 16, 17, and 19 (Hall 1.1-m). The October observations revealed an additional, fainter CN jet to the southeast. Numerical modeling of our data from August through October allowed us to determine that the rotation pole has an obliquity of about 15 degrees and the northern source is at a latitude of +50 to +60 degrees, assuming the comet is in principal axis rotation. A more detailed overview of our ongoing work can be found here. Our results appeared on IAUC 9163 and CBET 2512 (password required; an IAUC is forthcoming). We will continue observing Hartley 2 monthly into 2011. Stay tuned for further updates! |
10P/Tempel 2
|
Comet 10P/Tempel 2 was just the second comet whose rotation period was shown to change (Muller & Ferrin 1996). However, Muller and Ferrin were unable to determine the sign of the change due to aliasing of their period solution. Our group observed Tempel 2 extensively during its 1999-2000 apparition. This allowed us to conclusively determine the rotation period (8.941 +/- 0.002 hours), in agreement with one of Muller & Ferrin's solutions. This is ~32 seconds longer than the rotation period during the 1988 apparition, implying that Tempel 2 is slowing down by ~16 seconds per orbit. Results were presented at the 2009 Division for Planetary Sciences meeting (abstract), and have been submitted to the Astronomical Journal (Knight, Farnham, Schleicher, Schweiterman, 2010, "The Increasing Rotation Period of Comet 10P/Tempel 2"). Another extensive observing campaign of Tempel 2 is now underway. A second paper on Tempel 2 will incorporate our observations from 1999 (the first paper only considered it prior to the onset of activity) as well as these new observations. We expect to constrain the obliquity, pole position, and locations of jets via modeling. These observations should also reveal whether the changing rotation period of Tempel 2 is due to torques on the nucleus due to asymmetric outgassing at or near perihelion (in which case it should continue to exhibit a change in rotation period) or whether they were due to a one-time impulsive event. |
C/2007 N3 Lulin
|
We observed comet C/2007 N3 Lulin monthly from January-May 2009 using Lowell Observatory's Hall 42-inch telescope. Based on the repeating coma morphology we determined it has a rotation period of ~42 hours, an obliquity close to 90 degrees, and two jets, one near each pole (published on IAUC 9025). It exhibits seasonal changes in activity, as the ratio of the brightness of the jets changed as the sub-solar latitude moved from one hemisphere to the other. However, this change is less than expected from our modeling, and suggests that at least one jet may be active when not in direct sunlight, perhaps indicating that activity is driven by something other than sublimation of water. Results were presented at the 2009 Division for Planetary Sciences meeting (abstract) and a paper is in preparation for submission in late 2010. |
Previous Research
I completed my Ph.D. at the Department of Astronomy at the University of Maryland in 2008 under the supervision of Michael F. A'Hearn (with help from Doug Hamilton and Doug Biesecker). The primary focus of my thesis was understanding the physical processes and dynamics of sungrazing comets, however I also studied fragmenting comets, the Deep Impact encounter, and comet discovery statistics. I was supported from 2003-2008 by NASA Planetary Atmospheres grants NAG513295 and NNG06GF29G. Additionally, I have worked for the Planetary Data Systems Small Bodies Node (PDS-SBN) maintaining yearly lists of comet discoveries and calibrating observations of comets for archiving.
Sungrazing Comets
|
Since its launch in late 1995, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) has discovered more than 1600 comets. The vast majority of these have been members of the Kreutz group of sungrazing comets, having perihelion distances within 1-2 solar radii, highly inclined orbits (~143 degrees) and periods of 500-1000 years. In addition to the Kreutz group, four new groups of near-Sun comets have been discovered in SOHO images: the Marsden, Meyer, Kracht, and Kracht-II groups, and nearly 100 non-group comets have been discovered. While most SOHO comets are observed for less than 24 hours, the sheer quantity provides a robust dataset. These near-Sun comets present opportunities to probe otherwise unexplored regions of the Solar System, encountering vastly different temperatures and stresses than are experienced by all other known small bodies. By understanding their compositions and physical structure it is hoped that we can learn about the environment in which they formed millions of years ago.
|
Deep Impact
|
On July 4, 2005 the impactor from the Deep Impact mission struck comet 9P/Tempel 1. In support of this mission I observed the comet in the days before, during, and after impact from Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona. We observed the comet in the near-IR using the SQIID instrument on the 2.1-m telescope. This allowed us to observe the comet simultaneously in J, H, and K, and measure the color of the ejecta using aperture photometry. We combined our data with broadband optical (BVRI) data acquired at the same time by Kevin Walsh and colleagues at San Pedro Martir (Mexico), finding that the ejecta "bluened" immediately after impact and returned to their normal color by the following night, suggesting the ejecta were rich in water ice. These results were published in the Deep Impact special issue of Icarus. |
Schwassmann-Wachmann 3
|
I observed comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 (aka. SW3) near it's close approach to the Earth in May 2006. I observed SW3 in the near-IR using the SQIID instrument on the 2.1-m telescope at Kitt Peak. I observed fragments B and C over 8 nights, fortuitously observing fragment B during an outburst in which it brightened by >4 magnitudes from May 7-8. These observations were part of a collaboration in which we observed the comet in the optical and near-IR using multiple observing modes (narrowband imaging, broadband imaging, and spectroscopy) on several telescopes (KPNO 4-m, KPNO 2.1-m, WIYN, and McMath-Pierce Solar) over several weeks leading up to close approach. Preliminary results of this collaboration were presented at DPS [abstract] [abstract] and AAS [abstract] in 2006, and we expected to submit papers for publication in 2008. |
Comet Discovery Statistics
|
For the 2006 COSPAR conference in Beijing, China, I estimated the likely discovery rates of Kreutz sungrazing comets for STEREO and ground based all-sky surveys like Pan-STARRS [abstract]. While the potential for Kreutz discoveries with STEREO was good, the early returns are not promising, as the bandpass is unfavorable (the extremely bright sodium doublet is beyond the range) and the observing sequences tend to wipe faint, fast moving objects like comets before downlinking the data to the Earth. Due to the geometry of the Kreutz orbit, a survey with capabilities comparable to Pan-STARRS located in the Southern Hemisphere would stand a reasonable chance of discovering Kreutz comets several months before they reached perihelion. Without knowing the slope of the brightening beyond the SOHO field of view (we attempted to constrain this by conducting a small survey using the MOSAIC camera on the KPNO 4-m in January 2005) it is impossible to predict the actual number of Kreutz comets that might be discovered by such a survey.
|
Last updated 10-22-2010