Our panelists began the process by giving us quite a bit to think about. Following the coffee break, we began the first of two working group sessions. The five groups in both the morning and afternoon working group sessions were comprised of four or five attendees and were moderated by Ayres, Buzasi, Garrison, Lockwood, and Wade.
Each of the five working groups was given the same set of three questions. The specific questions appear below, but the general issues raised in each were as follows.
So that the SOC would have some chance of compiling the results from ten working groups into a coherent whole, the moderators were supplied with standardized, quantitative forms. Although some of the questions did not lend themselves ideally to quantization, this at least gave the workshop a firm starting point at the plenary session.
On the following pages, we have tabulated the results and comments made by each group in response to the questions. The group format was a relaxes, 75-minute, roundtable discussion that the moderators [theoretically] kept moving along. In fact, our moderators did a wonderful job of corralling the opinions of their group members, and the somewhat experimental format of this part of the meeting turned out to be quite successful.
The working groups were (groups 1-5 morning, 6-10 afternoon, moderators in brackets):
1: [Ayres], Corbally, Giampapa, Skiff, Soderblom
2: [Buzasi], Dobson, Guinan, Hall, Rottman
3: [Garrison], Cayrel, Glushneva, Harvey
4: [Lockwood], Guedel, Howard, Henry, Henry, de Mello, Schleicher
5: [Wade], Franz, Friel, Grundy, Radick, White
6: [Wade], Dahn, Glushneva, Guinan, Howard, Schleicher
7: [Ayres], Cayrel, Guedel, de Mello, White
8: [Buzasi], Franz, Friel, Corbally
9: [Garrison], Grundy, Radick, Rottman, Skiff
10: [Lockwood], Giampapa, Hall, Harvey, Soderblom